RoadToZion Posted January 23, 2021 Report Share Posted January 23, 2021 Stanford up 33-27 on #24 UCLA early in the 2nd. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th&Jackson Posted January 23, 2021 Report Share Posted January 23, 2021 KY - LSU is like watching an AAU game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted January 23, 2021 Report Share Posted January 23, 2021 52 minutes ago, BGleas said: Yeah, and it seems like the opposition always scores right away out of that timeout. Makes no sense. Well it isn’t like they won’t draw up a play. If you can’t set up your own defense after a make and get back down there...well you got bigger problems then a timeout will fix. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadToZion Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 46 minutes ago, RoadToZion said: Stanford up 33-27 on #24 UCLA early in the 2nd. Headed to OT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted January 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 8 minutes ago, RoadToZion said: Headed to OT. That de Silva(sp?) kid for the Cardinal is a ball player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadToZion Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 Wow what a finish. Layup at the buzzer. Stanford wins. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IU Scott Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 1 minute ago, RoadToZion said: Wow what a finish. Layup at the buzzer. Stanford wins. Great inbounds play Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FKIM01 Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 (edited) I feel ill rooting for Kentucky, but I hate Will Wade more than any D1 coach out there. Plus, Kentucky sucks this year anyway. Edited January 24, 2021 by FKIM01 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeking6 Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 1 hour ago, RoadToZion said: Stanford up 33-27 on #24 UCLA early in the 2nd. Doesn't hurt us one bit with Stanford beat UCLA. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted January 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 19 minutes ago, Seeking6 said: Doesn't hurt us one bit with Stanford beat UCLA. I was hoping the Friars would knock off 'Nova. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IU Scott Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 I am wondering if anyone else has been doing this but I have found myself watching for players who would be a good transfer candidates Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steubenhoosier Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 Ol’ coach Tommy had another defensive gem, only giving up 92 as the Dawgs lost to Florida 😂😂😂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosierfan1901 Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 Down goes Tennessee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCHoosier32 Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 9 hours ago, IU Scott said: I am wondering if anyone else has been doing this but I have found myself watching for players who would be a good transfer candidates I love the idea, but seems like a complete stab in the dark to have any idea who we'd have interest in and who would be interested in us right? I guess guys who we were one of the final 2 or 3 for coming out of high school? It doesn't usually seem to work that way though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDB Posted January 24, 2021 Report Share Posted January 24, 2021 12 hours ago, IU Scott said: I am wondering if anyone else has been doing this but I have found myself watching for players who would be a good transfer candidates Sounds like tampering to me and I don't want anything to do with that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IU Scott Posted January 26, 2021 Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 (edited) W. Virginia bear TT 88-87 on a shot with 6 seconds to go. TT was up 12 with 10 minutes to go but couldn't hold it. I know a lot of people criticized Archie for not extending the game by fouling with 45 seconds to go. W. Virginia hit a shot to cut it to 1 with 49 seconds left and Huggins played it out and did not foul. TT missed a 3 and then WVU hit the shot to win the game. Edited January 26, 2021 by IU Scott Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BGleas Posted January 26, 2021 Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 7 hours ago, IU Scott said: W. Virginia bear TT 88-87 on a shot with 6 seconds to go. TT was up 12 with 10 minutes to go but couldn't hold it. I know a lot of people criticized Archie for not extending the game by fouling with 45 seconds to go. W. Virginia hit a shot to cut it to 1 with 49 seconds left and Huggins played it out and did not foul. TT missed a 3 and then WVU hit the shot to win the game. I don't disagree with those saying that extending the game against Rutgers could have been the way to go, but at the same time what Archie did worked. IU stopped Rutgers on the possession, the problem is the players didn't execute and allowed Rutgers to get the offensive rebound. Race, our 2nd best rebounder didn't get position to box out and our wing on that side didn't help him by pinching on Johnson. The plan worked, the players didn't execute. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCHoosier32 Posted January 26, 2021 Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 56 minutes ago, BGleas said: I don't disagree with those saying that extending the game against Rutgers could have been the way to go, but at the same time what Archie did worked. IU stopped Rutgers on the possession, the problem is the players didn't execute and allowed Rutgers to get the offensive rebound. Race, our 2nd best rebounder didn't get position to box out and our wing on that side didn't help him by pinching on Johnson. The plan worked, the players didn't execute. This is what I have kept thinking, but not chimed in yet. It worked and I think the odds were better that way honestly. We just didn't rebound. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted January 26, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 Executing is our downfall. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th&Jackson Posted January 26, 2021 Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 (edited) 9 hours ago, IU Scott said: W. Virginia bear TT 88-87 on a shot with 6 seconds to go. TT was up 12 with 10 minutes to go but couldn't hold it. I know a lot of people criticized Archie for not extending the game by fouling with 45 seconds to go. W. Virginia hit a shot to cut it to 1 with 49 seconds left and Huggins played it out and did not foul. TT missed a 3 and then WVU hit the shot to win the game. Here’s a stat from that game. WV was 12-19 from 3 (63%) and 16-27 FTs (59%). Edited January 26, 2021 by 13th&Jackson 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BGleas Posted January 26, 2021 Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 53 minutes ago, NCHoosier32 said: This is what I have kept thinking, but not chimed in yet. It worked and I think the odds were better that way honestly. We just didn't rebound. I'm not sure on the odds specifically, but it did work. We had a good defensive possession and forced them to miss a tough shot. But as all game long, Rutgers outworked and out-toughed our players and got the rebound. That wasn't a strategy/coaching failure. Could fouling have worked better? We don't know. But Archie's strategy worked until the players didn't do their job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
go_iu_bb Posted January 26, 2021 Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 1 hour ago, rico said: Executing is our downfall. Yet somehow there is no issue with either coaching or the talent level. How does that work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted January 26, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, go_iu_bb said: Yet somehow there is no issue with either coaching or the talent level. How does that work? Ask UK or Duke this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
go_iu_bb Posted January 26, 2021 Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 10 minutes ago, rico said: Ask UK or Duke this season. Those can be explained by lack of experience. Freshmen having trouble acclimating to the college game as well as just making freshman mistakes. It's a risk that they make with their recruiting strategy. IU isn't lacking in that experience. Besides, this isn't a new issue under Miller. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted January 26, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2021 1 minute ago, go_iu_bb said: Those can be explained by lack of experience. Freshmen having trouble acclimating to the college game as well as just making freshman mistakes. It's a risk that they make with their recruiting strategy. IU isn't lacking in that experience. Besides, this isn't a new issue under Miller. It all comes down to execution, freshman mistakes or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.