IUFLA Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 That's Purdue in the gold and black 😁 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWatShot Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 I see the "go for 2 when you're down 8" fad now includes Purdue. #analytics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stlboiler23 Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 Defense still blows but at least the offense showed up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeking6 Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 I know Purdue sucks and all.....but I do cheer for them about 3x a year. Today is one of them. I hope this holds up. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosierfan1901 Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 Purdue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stlboiler23 Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 1 minute ago, Hoosierfan1901 said: Purdue? Back-up QB is legit haha. College football is nuts. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosierfan1901 Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 3 minutes ago, Stlboiler23 said: Back-up QB is legit haha. College football is nuts. Browne hasn’t played that that bad 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bronkonagurski Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 The ESPN boxscore is high on its own supply. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWatShot Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IUFLA Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 How friggin Purdue was that...😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stlboiler23 Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 That was the right call to go for 2. Gutsy effort but the Walters era still likely ends after Oregon loss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5fouls Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 (edited) Oregon just got screwed. Picked the ball off and the refs gave the catch to the OSU receiver who was bobbing it the whole time. Edited October 12 by 5fouls 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsidehoosier Posted October 12 Report Share Posted October 12 Oregon gonna figure out OSU is the B1G cash cow and darling 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kycarter88 Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 32 minutes ago, southsidehoosier said: Oregon gonna figure out OSU is the B1G cash cow and darling Oregon doing everything they can to give it to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5fouls Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 Now we have a phantom step out of bounds review so OSU can set up their defense. Can it be more blatant? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsidehoosier Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 Don’t think I’d go for 2 this early Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kycarter88 Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 This is a goofy game. Player ejections. Unintended onside kick. Missed PAT, interception not called. Rip away fumble. Just weird all in one game. Could be a fun finish. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kdug Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 (edited) 3 minutes ago, kycarter88 said: This is a goofy game. Player ejections. Unintended onside kick. Missed PAT, interception not called. Rip away fumble. Just weird all in one game. Could be a fun finish. Was that onside kick unintended? That’s what I thought initially, but all of the Oregon players jumped on it pretty quickly like they were expecting it. Either way, I’ve never seen a play like that. I’m wondering if they went for a squib, but aim directly for an OSU player. Hit it on line and that happens, miss and it’s just a normal squib kick. I kind of hope that’s what they were going for, would be a genius call. Edited October 13 by Kdug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kycarter88 Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 8 minutes ago, Kdug said: Was that onside kick unintended? That’s what I thought initially, but all of the Oregon players jumped on it pretty quickly like they were expecting it. Either way, I’ve never seen a play like that. I’m wondering if they went for a squib, but aim directly for an OSU player. Hit it on line and that happens, miss and it’s just a normal squib kick. I kind of hope that’s what they were going for, would be a genius call. That’s a ballsy call, if it was planned. You’d have to assume the return rate on that would be low. But they did react quite quickly, especially the kicker. Good game thus far. Ohio state wants to be the bully, and I hope they get punched one of these times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 Not an Ohio St fan but why did Oregon get to play that 2nd to last down with 12 guys. Cost Ohio state like 4-5 seconds. In the NFL if you get into formation with 12 and the snap is eminent they blow the play dead. Doesn’t seem fair to be able to play with 12 and take the time off the clock only cost yourself 5 yds. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgambill Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 Illinois officially is on my suck list. Been making money all year taking the points against Purdue….how they blow that is beyond me. As if I needed another reason to dislike both teams lol. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblaz13 Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 (edited) 9 hours ago, Stlboiler23 said: Back-up QB is legit haha. College football is nuts. He definitely played like he's been there before. Hard to believe, but Purdue-Oregon makes twice in a row of wanting them to win their game Lol.(edit: I just can't stand Illinois) Anyone beating Oregon or Penn State should be the current top IU fan rooting priorities after Indiana taking care of their own games. Edited October 13 by jblaz13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5fouls Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 3 hours ago, jblaz13 said: He definitely played like he's been there before. Hard to believe, but Purdue-Oregon makes twice in a row of wanting them to win their game Lol.(edit: I just can't stand Illinois) Anyone beating Oregon or Penn State should be the current top IU fan rooting priorities after Indiana taking care of their own games. A one loss OSU, Penn State, and Oregon will get in the playoff over a 1 loss IU team. That's going to happen. And, if one of those teams pick up a 2nd loss against one of the others in the Big Ten Championship, they still likely get in. What IU needs more than those teams losing is a Notre Dame loss. As pathetic as it would be, a 1 loss Notre Dame would get in over a 1 loss IU even though our loss is likely OSU on the road while theirs would be Northern Illinois at home. USC probably has the best chance at giving Notre Dame a 2nd loss. The numbers just aren't favoring 4 Big Ten teams right now. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeking6 Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 8 hours ago, dgambill said: Not an Ohio St fan but why did Oregon get to play that 2nd to last down with 12 guys. Cost Ohio state like 4-5 seconds. In the NFL if you get into formation with 12 and the snap is eminent they blow the play dead. Doesn’t seem fair to be able to play with 12 and take the time off the clock only cost yourself 5 yds. Glad someone else noticed this. I think I remember Coughlin doing that once for Giants. Either way really smart move by Oregon staff. Eliminate big play and lose 4 seconds of clock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier82 Posted October 13 Report Share Posted October 13 2 hours ago, Seeking6 said: Glad someone else noticed this. I think I remember Coughlin doing that once for Giants. Either way really smart move by Oregon staff. Eliminate big play and lose 4 seconds of clock. It wasn’t intentional and their 12th guy was barely on the field and didn’t really cover anyone. If OSU’s QB noticed he could have chucked it as a free play…if they come down with it then it’s a declined penalty for a big play. This argument could also be made for defensive offsides but I guarantee 98/100 times, offenses would prefer a free play over a dead ball. That said, I don’t hate giving the offense the option to put the time back on the clock for an accepted penalty 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.